The Bear is still alive and kicking…

12 September 2007 at 8:43 am | In Foreign Policy, Politics, Russia | Leave a Comment

It appears we cannot write Russia off as a basket case with a per capita GDP similar to Libya. The “Russian Bear” is still alive and kicking as seen today with the test of this “superbomb.”

Still waiting for Putin to start ruling be decree… It appears he is following the law for now in his managed democracy.

Pandering and failing to understand the Constitution…

27 July 2007 at 2:49 pm | In Constitution, Politics | Leave a Comment

Congressman and logshot presidential candidate clearly needs to read a copy of the Constitution based on his recent attempt to have Congress issue a pardon.

Giuliani and Federalism…

25 July 2007 at 10:13 am | In Abortion, Constitution, Federalsim, Politics, Rudy Giuliani, pro-choice republican | Leave a Comment

It sounds like Giuliani might be the only viable candidate who has as streak of federalism running through his body.

Giuliani argues that the best way to reduce tension about social issues is to allow states, rather than the federal government, to take the lead in responding to them. That would allow socially conservative and liberal states to each set rules that reflect the prevailing values inside their borders. Rather than perpetual combat in Washington, he insists, the nation could reach a new equilibrium as different states gravitated to different solutions.

In an interview last week, Giuliani said the key to resolving cultural arguments “where our society on a national level ends up being very divided” is to apply the “principle of federalism.” Questions on topics such as gun control, gay rights or aspects of abortion, he continued, “are issues that I think the founding fathers would say should be consigned to state and local governments, experimenting, deciding, having different views, and the federal government having a more limited role.”

Maybe Giuliani might be end this “culture war” nonsense that has paralyzed our politics for four decades?

Federalism serves Giuliani’s political interests because it allows him to reconcile his generally moderate social views with his socially conservative party. But he’s also right that federalism can serve society’s interests by allowing “a lot of room for difference” in a diverse country.

Federalism isn’t a panacea. On regulatory issues such as global warming, both environmentalists (who want concerted national action) and business (which prefers consistent rules) often find it unsatisfactory. Nor is either side in the culture war likely to abandon its effort to impose its vision on the entire society.

But over time, federalism might drain some of the fervor from that fight by allowing both cultural conservatives and cosmopolitans to control the rules in their communities on these difficult issues — at the price of allowing the other side to do the same.

Personally I think federalism is the only way to end the culture war on the federal and state levels. If New York wants gun control and gay marriage, let them. If South Dakota wants restrictions on abortion and no gay marriage, let them.

Will a Giuliani nomination and victory bring the pro-choice Republicans out of the closet?

22 July 2007 at 11:23 am | In Abortion, College Republicans, Philosophy, Politics, Rudy Giuliani, pro-choice republican | Leave a Comment

This is a question I have been asking myself recently. From my perspective, I have always found a good number of Republicans who are probably pro-choice, but just pander to the pro-life crowd for political reasons. I am not much of a panderer usually, but I used to play nice to the pro-life cause even though my position on the issue is complex to say the least. Once I freed myself of my College Republicans obligations, I more or less thought out my views on the subject and realized I am more or less pro-choice even though I think the practice is a sign of lacking responsibility for ones actions.

Will a Giuliani nomination and victory lead to more pro-choice Republicans appearing all of a sudden? Probably for two reasons: First, those who have pandered to the pro-life cause because the belief its essential to victory will be liberated from that mentality. Instead they will be honest about their beliefs and advocate the position they support.

Second, more people who are more or less in favor of the Republican economic agenda, but against the social agenda, will start supporting Republicans more vocally. I know a lot of younger people fall into this category. We might be socially moderate (my case) or socially liberal (one of my closest friend’s case), but we agree with the Republican economic agenda because it appeals to our upper income or future upper income lifestyle more than the Democratic nanny state model.

A Giuliani victory would reconfigure the political balance in this nation from a cultural divide to a more economic divide as his staunch free market policies will appeal to the upper and middle classes.

Giuliani and Nixon?

18 July 2007 at 12:43 pm | In Cultural Decay, Politics, Rudy Giuliani, pro-choice republican | Leave a Comment

Michael Gerson has written a column describing the similarities between Giuliani and Nixon.

I agree with Gerson to a point. The analysis of Giuliani being a cultural warrior like Nixon is excellent. Nixon’s disdain for social degenerates and coupled with his social moderatism helped him win twice. If Giuliani continues his record of going after social degenerates, this will work well in the general because it will play well in areas like Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, California, etc… He might lose votes in the south for not being pro-life, but he will gain far more votes in the northeast for being their kind of culture warrior.

Rudy Giuliani has a good chance of winning in areas that have been losing Republican voters for years because he mixes elements that appeal to the middle and upper class in suburban and urban areas by being fiscally conservative, but a socially moderate culture warrior going after social degenerates.

The problem with Gerson’s analysis is how Giuliani might be a very practical politician, but he is definitely to the right of Nixon on fiscal issues. Based on his record in NYC, he might be the most free market candidate that has a serious shot in a long time.

Giuliani cruising in PA, leading in MI

11 July 2007 at 10:49 pm | In Politics, Rudy Giuliani, pro-choice republican | Leave a Comment

Strategic Vision has a new poll out tomorrow saying Rudy Giuliani would trounce his opponents if the Pennsylvania Republican Presidential Primary was held today. Also, he leads in Michigan in a closer race.

PA - Giuliani leads with 42%, followed by Thompson at 16%, McCain at 10% and Romney 6%.

MI – Giuliani leads with 20%, followed by Romney at 15%, McCain at 14% and Thompson at 14%.

Nobody cared…

9 July 2007 at 4:02 pm | In Climate Change, Politics | Leave a Comment

Is it clear to everyone now that very few Americans care what a bunch of high school dropout celebrities think?

The broadcast of the Live Earth concert in the USA got horrible ratings.

This does not mean Americans do not care about global warming. They just do not like to have a bunch of uneducated celebrities think.

The issue of climate change is important, but its not the most important issue to most people.

Divided by change… do you adapt or fear…

8 July 2007 at 1:00 pm | In Philosophy, Politics | Leave a Comment

John Edwards talks about two Americas, well I have to agree there are two Americas. I have come to the conclusion our society is not divided by wealth, but by how they view the world.

On one side, there are people like myself who are open to innovation and believe things can be better. We are willing to adapt and realize “America” and the world will always change. We want our children to receive an education not just in our culture and its norms, but to have a good understanding of others. We are generally well educated and more nuanced when compared to the other “America.”

The other side is driven by a fear of change. They believe nothing beneficial can be learned from other societies. They fear anything that might be foreign. They oppose innovation because they might have to adapt. They are generally less educated and fear progress will hurt them.

Isn’t this the fundamental division today in American society?

Why did people view McCain as a viable candidate in the first place?

7 July 2007 at 12:07 pm | In John McCain, Politics, Rudy Giuliani, pro-choice republican | 1 Comment

I have been asking myself this question for nearly a year now. I still do not have a good answer to the question, but I have a few potential answers:

1) The media thought the base loved Bush. The base hates Bush and McCain tried to paint himself as Bush’s VP carrying the flag with the surge and immigration reform. Republicans have turned against the incompetent fool and McCain should just be Dick Cheney at this point.

2) People doubted Rudy Giuliani. I have never doubted Giuliani, but many wrote him off before the 2006 election. I was one of the few people who viewed him as a viable candidate with a good shot of winning.

3) McCain lost his mantle as the moderate. By tying himself to Bush and the surge, McCain pissed off the moderates. Giuliani also has squeezed him by being a moderate in the mold of many suburban Republicans – socially liberal, fiscally conservative. McCain is a populist and would never appeal to those votes unless he shed his opposition for abortion.

4) The media hyped the importance of social conservatives. The fact that Rudy Giuliani is still leading the national polls and most of the polls in the big states indicate how exaggerated the influence of the social conservative wing was by the media.

The big winner of McCain’s fall is Rudy Giuliani. Now he can consolidate the moderate/liberal Republican vote and go for the free market vote also because of his strong fiscal record. On top of this, he will have the tough guy mantle from NYC.

Bush’s idiocy grows by the day…

2 July 2007 at 8:03 pm | In Politics | 1 Comment

Why in the hell did he commute Libby’s sentence? Bush looks like a liar who supports liars because he said he would not commute the sentence earlier.

The reason he commuted Libby’s sentence is that he wanted to regain some ground with the Republican base for his break with them over immigration and his pathetic performance in regards to Iraq.

 The idiocy of Bush grows by the day.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.